Should nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own, but where sub-contractors make product for nike yes, but i do not believe that the firm is 100% responsible since it is the sub-contractors who operate and create conditions for workers. Even though nike claims to have changed their ways of doing business for the better and has improved factory conditions for their workers, they still put making profits and looking good to the public as their most important goals. In 1995 nike said it thought it had tied up with responsible factories in sialkot, in pakistan, that would manufacture well-made footballs and provide good conditions for workers instead, the work was sub-contracted round local villages, and children were drawn into the production process.
The recent factory collapse in bangladesh was a reminder that even though nike managed to turn around its image, large parts of the industry still haven't changed much at all nike was an early. To monitor progress, nike designed its own auditing tools “to help provide further transparency and insight” in how its contract factories are run within other countries in terms of working hours, wages, leadership standards, and working conditions (audit_tools, 2007. More than a decade ago, shoe giant nike came under fire for its use of sweatshop labor in the production of its products most of the criticism focused on its indonesian workforce, where workers.
Nike, long the subject of sweatshop allegations, yesterday produced the most comprehensive picture yet of the 700 factories that produce its footwear and clothing, detailing admissions of abuses. The critics have singled out nike, with its long history of manufacturing in asia, its $140 shoes and its stable of such athletic superstars as michael jordan on the payroll some in the united states deem nike factories in indonesia sweatshops, cheap labor mills where american companies can exploit underpaid workers to maximize profits back. Should nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own, but where subcontractors make products for nike 2 what labor standards regarding safety, working conditions, overtime, and the like, should nike hold foreign factories to: those prevailing in that country, or those prevailing in the united states.
“[hansae’s] customers, including nike, which has been making university logo goods at the factory for more than a decade, have been auditing the factory for years,” it noted. Nike, which came under heavy criticism a decade ago for its use of sweatshops and child labour, has taken steps since then to improve conditions at its 1,000 overseas factories. The company released its somewhat-annual corporate responsibility report this month, but it did not include a table that shows the average wages at the 785 contract factories that make nike products.
Factory monitoring companies have established a booming business in the two decades since gap, nike, walmart and others were tarnished by disclosures that their overseas factories employed. Beaverton, ore -- after years of criticism over its labor practices abroad, nike inc has disclosed for the first time the names and locations of more than 700 factories that produce its sneakers. However, nike has also used the subcontracting system as an excuse to avoid responsibility for environmental and work conditions in the sweatshops manufacturing nike shoes 2 dong nai is situated next to ho chi minh city.
1 what responsibility does nike have for conditions of work at foreign factories making its products the company expanded efforts to stop workplace abuse and started a public relations campaign. Should nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own, but where subcontractors make products for nike yes, nike is not only responsible but also accountable for the working conditions of foreign countries that it does not own. Pressure, primarily that from progressive groups, unions, and customers, has led nike to take responsibility for the welfare of workers in foreign factories that make its products.
What responsibility does nike have for conditions of work at foreign factories making its products the company expanded efforts to stop workplace abuse and started a public relations campaign it became the only shoe company in the world to eliminate the use of polyvinyl chloride in shoes construction, ending worker exposure to chloride compounds. Since the 1970s, nike, inc has been accused of using sweatshops to produce footwear and clothing items nike has denied the claims in the past, suggesting the company has little control over sub-contracted factories beginning in 2002, nike began auditing its factories for occupational health and safety issues. Making product responsibly lea’s dedication to understanding and improving factory working conditions and tohiro’s experience working at a contract factory show we all benefit when workers are engaged tohiro, contract factory employee & lea, nike employee.